Lab Automation: Which Processes Pay, and Which Ones Do Not
A category built on optimism deserves a sceptical test. Three conditions decide whether a process is worth automating, and knowing which of yours qualify is the whole exercise.
Archive
Showing 10 of 113 items
A category built on optimism deserves a sceptical test. Three conditions decide whether a process is worth automating, and knowing which of yours qualify is the whole exercise.
A LIMS is not hard to buy and it is hard to implement. The difference is a short list of decisions that get made badly, early, and quietly, long before anyone signs a contract.
Where informatics spending pays back, covering labour savings, rework, turnaround and inventory, plus the metrics to track and the barriers to expect.
Regulatory shifts landing in 2026, the frameworks behind them, the financial case for getting ahead, and a phased roadmap from gap analysis to accreditation.
EPA proposed moving PFAS treatment compliance to 2031, but initial monitoring results are still due April 26, 2027. What systems and labs must complete first.
The federal date slipped to 2028 but Walmart and Kroger set their own supplier deadlines, and the traceability gap most food suppliers miss sits in the lab.
A realistic sequence for leaving spreadsheets, Access and paper behind without pausing testing, including what happens to old data and who does the work.
Five jobs worth handing to software first, including instrument data entry, chain of custody, certificates of analysis, holding times and spec checking.
Breaks a quote into licensing, implementation, hosting and support, explains what drives the number up or down, and gives realistic ranges by lab size.
A phased way off spreadsheets and Access without pausing testing, covering what happens to existing data, how long it takes and how to bring staff along.