Continued Lab Staffing Shortages

Continued Lab Staffing Shortages | LabLynx Resources

Staffing shortages can be felt in a multitude of industries, and laboratories are not immune. In fact, the number of active laboratory professionals overall has decreased. Laboratory staff are the backbone of scientific research, and their expertise and experience are vital to ensuring accurate and reliable results. However, shortages in laboratory staff can significantly impact the efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of laboratory operations, leading to delays in research, compromised data, and increased risks to public health and safety.

Is there anything laboratories can do to prepare and improve efficiency to combat the staffing shortage?

Laboratory staff shortages impact felt by laboratories

The lack of laboratory personnel creates difficulties in the employment environment. These are the foundational components of laboratory research, and a shortage of them might undoubtedly have unfavorable outcomes for labs.

1.     Reduced capacity and productivity

One of the most immediate and obvious impacts of laboratory staff shortages is reduced capacity and productivity. With fewer technicians available to carry out experiments and analyses, the number of samples and tests that can be processed is inevitably lower, leading to delays in research and a backlog of samples.

This can have a knock-on effect on the wider scientific community, as delays in one laboratory can impact the work of other researchers who are relying on those results. For example, delays in analyzing samples from clinical trials can result in delays in drug development and approval, potentially costing lives and wasting resources.

2.     Increased workload and stress

The shortage of laboratory staff increases the workload of existing staff, leading to increased stress, burnout, and lower job satisfaction. The increased workload and stress have the potential to negatively impact the quality of the work being produced. Likewise, it can negatively impact the mental and physical health of laboratory staff.

Multiple studies have shown that increased workload and stress can lead to higher rates of errors and mistakes in all industries. In a laboratory setting, the result can be compromised quality and accuracy of scientific data. Furthermore, increased stress can lead to staff turnover, further exacerbating the shortage of laboratory staff and creating a cycle of understaffing and reduced productivity.

3.     Reduced quality and accuracy of results

Laboratory staff members are trained to ensure the accuracy and reliability of scientific data, and their expertise is essential to identifying and minimizing potential sources of error. When laboratory staff is in short supply, however, there is a higher risk of errors and mistakes, which can compromise the quality and accuracy of scientific results.

For example, inadequate training or lack of experience can lead to errors in sample preparation or analysis, while understaffing can result in rushed or incomplete data analysis. Such errors can have serious consequences, particularly in fields such as clinical research or drug development, where inaccurate or unreliable data can lead to incorrect diagnoses, ineffective treatments, or even harm to patients.

4.     Increased risk to public health and safety

Laboratory staff shortages can also have serious implications for public health and safety. For example, in clinical laboratories, delays in processing samples can lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment, potentially compromising patient outcomes. In food safety laboratories, understaffing can lead to delays in identifying and responding to outbreaks of foodborne illnesses, putting public health at risk.

Similarly, in environmental laboratories, inadequate staffing can lead to delays in identifying and responding to environmental hazards, such as contaminated water or air, putting communities at risk. In all of these cases, the consequences of laboratory staff shortages can be severe, potentially leading to illness, injury, or loss of life.

5.     Higher costs

Finally, laboratory staff shortages can lead to higher costs for both laboratory managers and the wider scientific community. When well-trained and experienced laboratory staff is in short supply, laboratories may need to rely on temporary staff, who are often more expensive than permanent staff.[1]

Delays in research can also result in wasted resources, as experiments may need to be repeated or revised, potentially costing significant time and money. Taking a long-term view, it is possible or even probable that laboratory staff shortages will negatively impact the reputation and funding of scientific institutions by causing delays in research or compromised data that impacts confidence in the quality and reliability of scientific results. It is imperative to take the necessary steps to ensure that your laboratory does not fall victim to lab staffing shortages.

Mitigate the impacts of staffing shortages on your laboratory

Laboratory staff shortages have been a growing concern in the scientific community. Most labs need more trained personnel to maintain productivity and efficiency. However, there are ways in which laboratories can thrive, despite these challenges, through a combination of strategic planning, innovative technologies, and effective collaboration.

One of the key strategies for laboratories to cope with staff shortages is to prioritize their research goals, which will help labs effectively streamline the workflow. By limiting their focus to key research areas, labs can ensure that they are making the most of their limited resources and avoiding unnecessary work that could waste time and effort. Additionally, by optimizing their workflow, labs can reduce the time and effort required for certain tasks, such as sample preparation or data analysis, allowing staff to focus on higher-value activities that require more specialized skills and expertise.

Another important factor in laboratory success is the use of innovative technologies and automation tools. Many labs have already implemented automation systems for tasks like plate handling, pipetting systems, and laboratory information management systems (LIMS), which can help to reduce errors and improve efficiency. Additionally, emerging technologies like robotics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning are being introduced in laboratory settings, providing new opportunities for process optimization and the analysis of data. By investing in automation technologies, labs can minimize the impact of staff shortages and improve their overall performance.

Collaboration is also a critical component of success in the laboratory, particularly in the context of staff shortages. By fostering strong relationships between lab members, as well as with external collaborators, labs can leverage the expertise and resources of a wider network to achieve research goals. Collaboration opportunities can include the sharing of equipment and facilities, collaboration on research projects, and sharing expertise and knowledge through presentations, publications, and other outlets. When labs work together to tackle larger projects, they can mitigate the effects of staff shortages by pooling more personnel and resources than a single lab can provide.

Finally, it is essential for laboratories to take a proactive approach to talent management, training, and retention to mitigate the impacts of staff shortages. Such strategies include increasing the amount of cross-training for existing staff members to develop new skills by offering professional development opportunities to both new and existing staff. By investing in professional development, labs can not only mitigate the impact of staff shortages but also build a more resilient and adaptable workforce that is better equipped to tackle future challenges.


[1] A. (2021, April 8). Addressing the Clinical Laboratory Workforce Shortage – ASCLS. ASCLS.

Share this Article

Contact Us

"*" indicates required fields

I am interested in:*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.